Monday 24 September 2018

View from the Left



EMS Namboodirippad (2010), History, Society and Land Relations, New Delhi: LeftWord books, pp. 239.

EMS Namboodirippad was the leader of the first democratically elected Communist government in the world when he became the first chief minister of Kerala in southern India in 1957. A political leader and a Marxist thinker of immense influence, his essays are a great introduction to his critical approach to understanding Indian society and history. This is one of the two books of his collected essays in English (the other being The Frontline Years), both published by LeftWord. For the student who is interested in Indian history and society, his work is valuable because EMS was that rare breed of practitioner-theoretician, who had at his disposal data and field observations of considerable scale. Furthermore, he chose to analyze them academically, making the sources of his data and the methodology employed transparent. This is especially evident in his examination of the question of land ownership and social classes, a problem still relevant in many developing countries today.

The core thesis
This book contains 14 essays and one interview. The essays thematically span Marxist analysis of history (3 essays), the question of caste, class and the Indian national question (6 essays) and a detailed examination of the feudal system and land relations in Kerala (3 essays). There are two odd essays- one on the Marxist interpretation of the separation of idealist and materialist philosophy in India and the other on the possible trajectories of evolution of the Indian judiciary.

The core thesis of EMS’ analysis is that he sees Asian societies as exception (along with Germanic, Slavonic and Ancient classical societies) to the linear evolution of history from primitive communism to slavery, feudalism and capitalism of the European kind that Marx argued. Relying on Marx’s Notes (1956-57), EMS contends that these societies underwent a different form of transition into ‘village societies’ that was crucial in deploying property relations differently and eschewing slavery and serfdom. For example, in these societies, the individuals are never fully separated from the society and are tied by bonds of kinship or locality. Furthermore, property claims in land is differentiated from that of labour. Therefore, a land lord is not merely a rent collecting agent (economic role), but the head of an inherited social system (caste and its variants). This duality of economic and social relations needs to be considered whilst analyzing political and social questions in the contexts of such societies.

Barring a few typographical errors, the book is an important contribution to critical historical thinking in India. The essays are thematically presented with a brief introduction. Although the articles are rooted in their historical circumstances, the analytical method and the questions that the author evoke remain relevant to this day. A timely revisit to the old questions!