Elizabeth Chatterjee
(2013)
Delhi Mostly Harmless: One Woman’s Vision
of the City
Random House India, pp. 283
Delhi Mostly Harmless: One Woman’s Vision
of the City
Random House India, pp. 283
I began the year reading Liz Chatterjee’s portrait of Delhi based on the one year she spent collecting data as a doctoral student of the University of Oxford. There are many portraits of modern Delhi, beginning with the elegy written evocatively for the older courtly Delhi in 1940 (Twilight in Delhi by Ahmad Ali), to the modern project in the making that Delhi has become in the recent decades penned by academics (Unsettling Memories by anthropologist Emma Tarlo). My personal favourite books are those by that incorrigible breed of Flâneurs (City of Djinns by William Dalrymple) and novelists (Midnight’s Children and The White Tiger). There is also the attempt to know Delhi through its people (Capital by Rana Dasgupta) or visuals (Delhi: The Making of the City by Malavika Singh and Rudrangshu Mukherjee).
Liz Chatterjee is part flâneur and part
anthropologist. Her memory of the city, its people, and its stories come out
not in anecdotes or metaphors but as disjointed parts of a person. She literally
senses the city around her and her chapters are arranged in anatomical terms-
eyes, noses, hearts, veins and so on. And sometimes she gropes the pragmatic
old lady Dilli followed by rubbing shoulders off the new city of Delhi. The
savvy that carries an Indian along, part oblivious and part accommodative to the
paradoxes and contradictions of any part of India she resides in-with boisterous openness to outsiders and cold
conservatism that builds hierarchy, the invisible ropes of high morals and low
traps of indignity, can be mind boggling.
The usual dilemmas of finding a safe
perch, making friends, settling into a routine in a new city is there; but what
makes Liz’s story poignant is the solitude of a researcher, a foreigner, a
non-Delhite- who is both an insider and outsider to the story. Liz is an
enterprising raconteur and this comes out best in her uncanny ability to get
her analysis right- she calls jugaad, the
dark art that requires ingenuity to fix things, to have savoir-faire and not
such technical skills. She is blunt and direct when describing the hundred indignities
a woman goes through in private and public space, some very specific to the
city. Through every difficult experience, what remains intact is her sense of
humour.
What make her book delightful are those
parts where she tries to preserve the experience of being with someone who is
hardly likeable. She uses her sense of olfaction to store a million things that
is worth a thousand words or photographs of the city she has lived in for a
year. In one of my favourite parts of the book, she says, of the faint coconut oil
that scents a woman’s hair, to the stink of stolen cigarettes, the mixture of
sweat and cheap cologne and names a number of such things that made this story
her own, ending with the glorious fragrance of burnt flat in the first rain of
the season. Then she finds the right words for such a nose for nostalgia- manvasanai in Tamil and petrichor in
English for describing the Greeks God’s blood through the veins of rock.
And in the end, she concludes, ‘Delhi,
the delirious city, city of the tense present, future imperfect’. Comparing her
across the globe, New York may be a wise
guy, Paris a coquette, Rome a gigolo, Berlin a wicked uncle and London an old
lady- Delhi looks like an ageing Tsarina- ruthless, capricious, avaricious,
paranoid and like all grandes dames,
jingles with theatricality, bling and the so –bad-it’s-good. At the same time, the modern city of Delhi,
built for rulers and administrators, is a sophisticated cougar, modelling herself
to the twenty first century with overconfidence and attempts at self assertion
of an adolescent. This duality of a theatrical old-hand who has witnessed human
history and a restless adolescent trying to seek attention and assert her
presence, makes the city difficult to like or understand but hard to ignore.