12 women, 200 years

 

Bernardine Evaristo (2019), Girl, Woman, Other, Penguin books, pp.453

The book came to me as a gift, literally,

a discerning friend’s nod for my love of the literary.

I am glad this book and this author found me

they way they did,

when I was least expecting.

That’s when you are the most vulnerable

and completely open,

an attitude best suited to read

something so expansive as this novel,

the story and history of twelve women

through two centuries across many continents,

told in a compelling contemporary way.

 

Bernardine Evaristo,

writer, poet, playwright, professor,

the first black woman to win the Booker Prize

an accolade she shared with another great writer,

is a gifted story teller.

As you read through the novel

this aural quality pervades,

the prose is poetic and musical,

evocative and vivid.

So, you picture the protagonists and the places

and hear them speak and think,

walk through the gullies of your mind,

sashaying and shushing,

as they erupt into thoughts and doubts.

 

It is a tour de force of human history

in the last two centuries,

colonialism, slavery, racism, casteism,

sexism, queerphobia,

all roads taken

to be the human race we are today,

 explored within the microcosm

of individual lives,

specific plots and timelines.

 

And yet they interrupt each other,

invade and interact with one another

to give the map of a gnarly tree, the pedigree,

from which, these unlikely compatriots

hang like irreverent fruits.

They are ancestors and descendants,

peers and sisters,

exploring and bickering their way

through history and their stories.

 

Girl, Woman, Other has

the themes and temperaments

that Evaristo’s works tend to have,

 an evaluative perspective of received wisdom

from as many angles as possible,

and a lyrical quality to radical thoughts.

 

As winter buries us with an impossible longing

for a year that is fast slipping by,

this is the perfect companion

to soothe and comfort you,

enlighten and frighten you,

but above all give you so many opportunities

to live out the lives of others

however imaginary.

That’s what all good writers do.

 

Irish Love

 

Sally Rooney (2018), Normal People, Faber and Faber, London, pp. 266

This is the book you should take with you in summer to remember what it feels like to read a great love story. It is small town Ireland and two young people are in love as they move from high school through college and are just about to begin life. It is that time of life when it is perhaps the most awkward to write about love without sounding flippant or pedantic. It is difficult to speak of love that is so young and unsure, yet when done right it is the kind of quiet love that makes you yearn for good literature.

Sally Rooney does it right. Not just in the convincing way she portrays the protagonists, but also scooping up the sounds and smells of the small town, the flavor of its people, the tone and tenor of high school in the backwater stillness of the place, its intimacies and resentments. The book brings to life those who have adapted themselves for life in a quiet town that the world does not come to. It requires skill and an astute mindset to stay full of life and happy in any place, but more so in a quaint little space dancing to its own tune. The town is abuzz with news - rumours, love affairs, desertion, quiet suicide, seething anger and the whole melodrama that makes life. And amidst this are two people, vulnerable in their lack of self - consciousness, who manage to escape that world without meaning to, and stay connected with each other.

I admit it is difficult to write about it than read and enjoy it. Grab a copy and have a lovely summer! There is an adaptation streaming on Prime, but you are not going to, are you?

Intimations

 

Zadie Smith (2020), Intimations, Penguin Books, pp. 82

We all need the quiet homecoming of the literary kind, especially at a time we were forced to confine ourselves and sever all physical ties to people, places, and things in the year of the pandemic. It was not one long year we could foresee, neatly planned with a release date set. Rather, the news of our own predicament came to us in ebb and flow, like a menacing current of wave, swinging our hope to despair and back. At a time like this, we needed the quiet intimation from a philosopher like Zadie Smith.

In this slim but profound meditation spanning six luxurious essays, Smith fills the questions she asks as a human, prised open from her faith and familiarity with the world, by giving answers only a writer can. The thought traverses the intimate world of peonies, neighborhood, the familiarity of strangers and their silent solidarity in belonging to the same world and world views, slowly moving to the shattering of this world not with a big bang but with a quiet twang in which lives were upended. What does it mean to ask the same old questions of being and belonging in this new world of suspension? What can one hope for? How can we imagine again?

This stunning book of thoughts was my tough companion through some of the most difficult times of my adult life as I lost certainty and learned to live without it. And I dread to think what you would have gone through, dear reader, although I also know you must be the stronger for it. For you and I are survivors.

There were many who did not outlive this pandemic. Let this space, these words, and thoughts be dedicated in their loving memory.

 

 

The Tyranny of Merit

 

Michael J. Sandel (2020), The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?, Allen Lane, New Delhi, pp. 272

You might know him from the legendary course Justice. Michael Sandel is a political philosopher at Harvard University and the author of celebrated books such as What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits to Market and Justice: What’s the Right Thing to do. His new book on the discourse of merit unpacks the foundation of the ‘winner-takes-all’ world we live in. This is an important work for our times and can be productively read with the last two reviews of this blog on the Deaths of Despair and the Future of Work. The undercurrent that these thinkers are trying to navigate is not just the causes of unacceptable inequality that exists in our world today, but also how we have acknowledged, justified, and normalized it in our lives through narratives and discourses. An important idea that we have used to make sense of this inequality and impoverishment of many amidst prosperity and abundance of some is that of ‘merit’.

By merit, Sandel does not allude to the rhetoric of ‘you deserve what you get’, but how the institutionalization of the merit rhetoric works in practice. Be it higher education or professional career, the accident of birth and the substantial benefits it endows is rendered invisible and made unnavigable to outsiders, creating a patina of neutrality behind which an unequal and unjust world operates nonchalantly. Consequently, the public values in social institutions such as education, healthcare and work that enables social mobility is blocked and accountability is difficult to elicit when ideology supports unjust privileges in the name of just desserts. Using the case of the United States of America, Sandel argues how we veritably inhabit two mutually exclusive worlds, one of privilege and the other of despair, with their own norms that rule these worlds.

With seven chapters excluding an introduction and conclusion, this book makes for compact reading. As always, Sandel makes the history and the axiomatic premises of his arguments accessible and revealing. He uses contemporary and relevant illustrative examples, asks challenging questions, and pushes us out of our intellectual comfort zones. By doing so, he compels us to look long and hard at the society we have designed for ourselves and deemed worthy of passing on to the next generation. This is the type of writer that you must never miss reading. Get your copy today.

The Future of Work

Daniel Susskind (2020), A World without Work, Allen Lane, pp.326

This International Labour Day, here is a book that looks into the future of work. As we commemorate the rights at work that were incrementally earned over a century by means of labour movements, the cruel irony is that we are facing a future where there is much less work in the form of formal employment. As machines become adept at solving tasks, how do humans find ways to sustain economically? Without work, how do we define the meaning and purpose of life?

Daniel Susskind is an economist at Oxford University and the co-author of the much- acclaimed The Future of Professions.  Having been part of the British Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit, he has considerable experience at the highest levels of policy making in the United Kingdom. The influence of having dabbled in the world of ideas that work on the ground shines through this book, as Susskind grapples with technology and automation that decimates work that humans perform, and argues how we must respond and rise up to this challenge.

The structure of the book clearly demarcates the three sections - threat, context and response – each with four chapters. In the first section, Susskind examines the historical context of misplaced anxiety throughout the industrial revolution when machines continually displaced human labour. Through the historical examples, he seeks to understand and compare tasks performed by humans and machines. Understanding how machines work is helpful in estimating what kind of work they are likely to displace humans at and others they require humans to collaborate with.

In the second section, Susskind explores unemployment theoretically. Here, the author elaborates on task encroachment by machines, differentiates frictional from technological unemployment, and examines the relationship between technology and inequality. In the third section, the author moves on to how we can respond to the unemployment challenge posed by automation. He discusses the role of education, state regulation and corporations in responding meaningfully to the reality of less and less work in the world.

If you want an overview of the type of changes that are coming in the world of work, this is a good book to begin with. The approach taken to understanding the issue is predominantly economic, but Susskind also brings in perspectives from history and sociology to augment his arguments. The language is clear and succinct and the parts are neatly organized. In fact, there is a structural symmetry to the form led by the content of the book. A high recommendation for graduate students, academics, policy makers, and the lay reader alike.

America’s Deaths of Despair

 

Anne Case and Angus Deaton (2020), Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp. 312

This is perhaps the most important book to come out last year that argues trenchantly about what inequality can do to a society. Princeton economists and real-life spouses Anne Case and Angus Deaton (who also happens to have won the Nobel Prize in Economics) examine the reasons for the recently observed deaths of despair among white Americans. In doing so, they open the black box of what globalization, deindustrialization, and persistent unemployment and low-quality employment have pushed an erstwhile working-class group into poverty and precarity in a span of a few decades. Divided into four parts, the authors dissect the problem, bring evidence-based arguments and look for possible institutional solutions. As the title suggest, they are optimistic enough to believe that there is a future for capitalism despite its epic tragedies!

The authors begin with the question, why the ‘deaths of despair’? The poignantly named phenomenon refers to the recently observed deaths among the erstwhile white working-class Americans resulting from suicide, alcohol and drug abuse. These deaths of despair have risen to hundreds of thousands in recent years making a disturbing mark in large-scale demographic data, indicating systemic malaise and reversing the great public health strides in life expectancy since 1918. In exploring these deaths, the authors unearth the dismantling of society that systemic failures of institutions and politics resulted in after the golden decades immediately succeeding World War II. The book also critiques how the American public health system particularly failed its people and often actively colluded in their descent into despair and demise.

The story of the American white working-class despair is set amidst the indifference of the rest of the world as it shifted gear to a new ideology and left entire communities bereft of well-paying jobs, a place in society, and meaning in their lives. The best thing about this book is how data has been used to make claims and arguments. The writers bring disaggregated panel data from public health and economics to compare white middle-class Americans with other demographic groups such as Hispanics and African Americans to demonstrate how they slipped and fell as the discourse around progress and prosperity changed rapidly since the 1970s.

Beyond the immediate issue of the white-working class crisis, this book gives space to the race question in the United States, the equation between white privilege of the working class and minority politics, the divide on the immigration issue and partly explains the resurgence of populist politics. Unlike some data-driven scholarly works, this book is written with a heart. The pain is palpable and the poignancy is evident even as evidence is marshalled to show what went wrong with a surgical precision. Read the work with care and debate vigorously the arguments it provokes.

The Great Gender Data Gap

 

Caroline Perez (2019), Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, Chatto & Windus, London, pp. 411

As we celebrate the international women’s history month in March every year, there is no better way to gain perspective than grab a copy of this well-researched and witty book that fiercely lays bare the gender-shaped hole in human history. Caroline Perez, a writer, broadcaster, and an award-winning feminist campaigner, brings her excellent research acumen and flair for debate to illuminate how the human society has been designed to suit the default setting called male. As a result, the female gender has always had to either unfairly adjust to the setting that did not take into consideration its existence or vociferously demand change often inviting the wrath of everyone.  Using mundane everyday inconveniences such as phones that are too big for their hands or city planning that was oblivious to their existence, to systematic structural inequalities such as assumptions of merit and skills at workplace that affect their progress and well-being, the author argues how women had to contend in a world designed for men.

Divided into six parts and sixteen chapters, the book delves into specific examples spanning the private lives to the public where the female is made invisible and its implications for everyone. Perez uses different types of data such as statistics to case studies, quantitative inferences to in-depth interviews to make her point. What makes her job extremely challenging and the reader’s experience exceptionally rewarding is that she succeeds in showing us the absences. Demonstrating care and domestic work, she unpacks the working of millions of women working invisibly and silently to keep the visible acts of male achievement alive. She also pulls up female achievement which has for centuries masqueraded as male genius, unearthing artists, scientists, doctors, engineers, thinkers, creators, and dreamers who contributed something original to humanity. She then discusses how can we build a future that is gender acknowledging.

Anyone who believes in an equal human society must read this work. So should individuals who are design thinkers and want to make a difference. So should young students and experienced researchers. This book indicates where we have been blind-sided and how to go about correcting ourselves. This work speaks of our unfair and unequal self-fulfilling psychological prophecies that have systematically failed to acknowledge girls and women as creative, constructive and capable human beings. My hope is that through works such as these, we have the persistence to also unearth other gender-shaped absences that have languished in the dark shadows of history.

  

 

 

The Life with Books

Photo credit: Saatchi Art/ Reproduction of the painting Reading a Book by Trayko Popov

“What do they know of books, that only books know?”

This blog about books, that began its journey on a boxing day, has completed seven years of life. I knew that as long as I was up and about, one of the few things that I would be sure to do was read books. Writing about them was a natural step further; choosing to share it with the world, a cultivated commitment. Yet here we are in another decade, you reading what I wrote, and I reading what I am about to write. This will be a good time to share some of the things I often get asked about the blog.

First off, why this blog? I owe my love of reading mostly to the head-librarian of my school. Without knowing what a library was, one day, I forayed into its expansive entrance. The librarian sternly picked up four books from the nearby shelf and waved them in front of me. I reached out to one with a horse on the cover. She asked me to come back in a month to return the book along with a library notebook to write about what I had read. That is how I finished Anna Sewell’s ‘Black Beauty’ the first ever book I read on my own in English. For the first two years or so, I logged every single book I read in a notebook duly read by my librarian who had picked those books for me. So, reading, like all the goods things I have ever had the good fortune to learn, was a team project that was heavily supervised at first. That is also how reading began as an obsessive act of recording.

Do I read every book I write about here? No, I read far more! From the larger list of books, the ones featured here come for many reasons – gravity of theme, weight of arguments, originality, contemporaneity, recognition and so much more. If I have to boil them down to cardinal principles, then there are two that I have never violated. I have never written about a book that I really did not love. I have also never shared a book that I thought was not beautifully written and produced.

Why a generalist blog? When I began writing about books, there was no plan shape it up a particular way, including increasing readership. I have never really tried to attract readers by talking about just one type of books. In the end, talking more about one type of book would mean staying untrue to my reading, which is more akin to grazing the pastures than eating from a menu. Deep down, I read for pleasure and would not like to have it any other way. And even deeper down, I have always believed that books would help me with everything I need to know. Hence, the rabbit hole!

And now for the question that I do not get asked at all. Do you, as a reader, have to be wary of anything? CLR James the great cricket historian asked in his beautiful book ‘Beyond a boundary’ “what do they know of cricket that only cricket know”? This article begins with a similar rhetorical question on books. It is impossible to understand books without the larger context of life in which they are immersed. Conversely, it is challenging to comprehend life without books. Maybe, understanding this dilemma is a good way to be reminded of the importance of critical reading? So, dear reader, who stuck with me through thick and thin volumes, welcome back to happy reading!